- Tweet
- Share this
- Email
- Print

Swiss commodities trader Glencore's logo is seen in front of its headquarters in Baar, near Zurich, February 6, 2012.
Credit: Reuters/Romina Amato
LONDON (Reuters) - Glencore (GLEN.L) is planning a three-way carve-up of Canada's largest grain handler Viterra (VT.TO), an industry source said, to help navigate a politically charged federal review process if it wins the looming bidding war for the company.
Earlier reports said that commodity trading giant Glencore, also bidding for mining group Xstrata (XTA.L), was planning to launch a joint offer with two Canadian companies, privately-owned grain trader Richardson International and fertilizer producer Agrium (AGU.TO).
The industry source told Reuters that Glencore would instead buy all of Viterra and then sell its retail fertilizer business to Agrium, with Richardson taking the food processing unit in a rare and complex so-called "back-to-back" transaction.
Viterra said this week it had established a process for considering expressions of interest from parties it declined to name, which sent the stock up 10 percent.
Reuters reported previously that U.S.-based Bunge (BG.N) and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM.N) had made approaches along with Glencore.
A foreign takeover of Viterra would be subject to a federal government review to determine whether it is of "net benefit" to Canada. The government vetoed a takeover of Potash Corp (POT.TO) by Anglo-Austalian mining giant BHP Billiton (BLT.L) in 2010, damaging the country's image as a free market supporter.
Ottawa may be less likely to block a foreign bid for Viterra, however, because its home province of Saskatchewan has already said it doesn't see the company as a strategic resource and does not collect royalty revenues from it, unlike Potash.
Glencore declined to comment.
(Reporting by Victoria Howley; Editing by Chris Wickham and Helen Massy-Beresford)
Related Quotes and News
Company
Price
Related News
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment on reuters.com.
Add yours using the box above.
0 comments:
Post a Comment